Matic Spec vs Hasan Ibrahim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Spec vs Ibrahim analysis and find out who is favored!
Matic Spec vs Hasan Ibrahim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Spec 1 - 0 Ibrahim
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Spec has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ibrahim has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Spec, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ibrahim has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Spec has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ibrahim has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Spec has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ibrahim winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59). Ibrahim has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 27/ 31).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Spec winning 1 times and Ibrahim being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Spec winning 2 and Ibrahim winning 0. The last match between Spec and Ibrahim was at the M15 Bad Waltersdorf, 22-08-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Matic Spec getting the victory 6-2 2-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Spec and Ibrahim have played a deciding set 0 times, with Spec winning 0 times and Ibrahim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Spec winning 0, and Ibrahim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Spec has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ibrahim has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Spec has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ibrahim has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Spec has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ibrahim has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
64% (167-95)
Career Total W/L
47% (37-41)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Matic Spec vs Hasan Ibrahim For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Spec VS Ibrahim
stats | Matic Spec | Hasan Ibrahim |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 8 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 2-0 ret. |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matic Spec | Hasan Ibrahim |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Hasan Ibrahim Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Michael Zhu
Player
Hasan Ibrahim
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
6
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Hasan Ibrahim
Player
Kris Krawcewicz
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Hasan Ibrahim
Player
Tushar Madan
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Giuseppe La Vela
Player
Hasan Ibrahim
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Savva Polukhin
Player
Hasan Ibrahim
38%
(
21 of
55)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hasan Ibrahim
Player
Antonin Bolardt
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Hasan Ibrahim
Player
Onder Balci
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Spec Vs Ibrahim Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Spec are available here and Ibrahim photos here.